LOGOS
AESTHETIC
σχῆμα δικανικόν (τό)

ΣΧΗΜΑ ΔΙΚΑΝΙΚΟΝ

LEXARITHMOS 1084

The phrase σχῆμα δικανικόν refers to a specific rhetorical figure or technique employed in forensic oratory, i.e., legal speeches. It is not merely an external form, but a strategic arrangement of discourse designed for persuasion and for either defense or accusation. Its lexarithmos (1084) suggests a complex structure and the completion of a form with a specific purpose.

REPORT ERROR

Definition

According to the Liddell-Scott-Jones Lexicon, «σχῆμα δικανικόν» is described as a "rhetorical figure" or "figure of thought" found specifically in forensic speeches. It is a technical term of ancient rhetoric, denoting a particular form of expression or arrangement of arguments, crafted to influence the audience and serve the orator's purpose in court.

The term «σχῆμα» (form, posture, arrangement) in this context does not solely pertain to the external appearance of speech, but also to its internal structure and psychological impact. It is intrinsically linked to the art of persuasion (πειθώ) and the orator's ability to shape the perception of judges or the public. The adjective «δικανικόν» specifies the domain of application, namely the judicial environment, where precision, logical coherence, and the emotional charge of discourse are critical.

Ancient rhetoricians and theorists of rhetoric, such as Aristotle in his «Rhetoric» and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, extensively studied various figures, recognizing their importance for the effectiveness of speech. «Σχῆμα δικανικόν», as a specialized category, underscores the adaptation of rhetorical art according to the type of discourse (deliberative, epideictic, forensic).

Etymology

«σχῆμα ← ἔχω (root σχ-/σεχ-, meaning 'to have, hold, be in a state')»
The root σχ-/σεχ- belongs to the oldest stratum of the Ancient Greek language and is connected to the verb ἔχω, from which σχῆμα derives. Its meaning revolves around the concepts of 'to have,' 'to hold,' 'to be in a certain state,' or 'to present a form.' From this fundamental idea, notions of external form, posture, appearance, and mode of being developed. The semantic evolution from 'to have' to 'form' is internal to the Greek language, reflecting the understanding that form is what an object or person 'has' or 'presents.'

From the same root σχ-/σεχ- derive many words signifying possession, state, relation, or form. The verb ἔχω is the base, while its derivatives such as σχῆμα (the form something 'has'), σχέσις (the state or relation one 'has' with something), and σχολή (the time one 'has' free) highlight various facets of the root. The concept of 'hypocrisy' or 'acting' (ὑπόκρισις) is also connected, as it implies the 'assuming' or 'presenting' of a role or a form.

Main Meanings

  1. Rhetorical figure in forensic oratory — A specific form of expression or arrangement of arguments used in legal speeches for persuasion.
  2. Stylistic arrangement of discourse — The selection and organization of words and phrases to achieve a specific rhetorical effect in court.
  3. Form of argumentation — The manner in which legal arguments are structured to be presented most effectively.
  4. Orator's posture or appearance — The physical stance, gestures, or overall presence adopted by the orator to enhance their speech.
  5. Method of presenting a case — The overall strategy and form by which a legal case is presented in court.
  6. Technique of persuasion — A specialized technique used to influence the opinion of judges or the audience, often through emotional appeal or logical artifice.

Word Family

«σχ- / σεχ- (root of the verb ἔχω)»

The root σχ-/σεχ- generates a rich family of words in Ancient Greek, all connected to the original meaning of the verb ἔχω, i.e., 'to have, to hold, to be in a certain state.' From this fundamental idea, meanings developed concerning external form, internal disposition, relation, posture, and appearance. Each member of the family illuminates a different aspect of this root, from simple possession to the complex shaping of discourse or existence, demonstrating the internal dynamism of the Greek language to create complex concepts from basic roots.

ἔχω verb · lex. 1405
The basic verb from which the root σχ-/σεχ- derives. It means 'to have, to hold, to possess,' but also 'to be in a certain state, to be.' It is the source of the idea of possessing a form or a condition.
σχῆμα τό · noun · lex. 849
The form, shape, appearance, posture. That which an object or person 'has' as its external arrangement. In rhetoric, it refers to figures of speech or thought. (Plato, Republic 398c)
σχέσις ἡ · noun · lex. 1215
The relation, state, disposition. Derived from ἔχω, it denotes the way in which something 'has' or 'relates' to something else, the condition it is in. (Aristotle, Categories 8, 9a28)
σχηματίζω verb · lex. 1966
To form, to shape, to fashion. The verb derived from σχῆμα, indicating the action of creating or changing a form. It is also used metaphorically for shaping ideas or discourse.
ὑπόκρισις ἡ · noun · lex. 1090
Hypocrisy, pretense, the performance of a role (originally theatrical). It is connected to the idea of 'assuming' or 'presenting a σχῆμα' that is not genuine, i.e., adopting an external form. (Demosthenes, On the Crown 262)
σχεδόν adverb · lex. 929
Nearly, almost, close by. Derived from the adjective σχεδός ('near, ready at hand'), which in turn is connected to ἔχω in the sense of 'having something ready, close at hand.' It indicates proximity to a state or quantity.
ἐποχή ἡ · noun · lex. 763
Suspension, pause, epoch (as a period of time). From ἐπέχω ('to hold back, to suspend'). The concept of 'pause' or 'suspension' is linked to 'holding' or 'having under control,' while as 'epoch' it denotes a defined temporal 'state'.

Philosophical Journey

The concept of «σχῆμα δικανικόν» developed in parallel with the evolution of rhetoric as an art and science in ancient Greece, reaching its zenith with the great orators and theorists.

5th C. BCE
Presocratics and Sophists
Gorgias and other sophists laid the foundations of rhetoric, experimenting with figures of speech and persuasive techniques, especially in forensic discourse.
4th C. BCE
Plato and Aristotle
Plato criticized superficial rhetoric, while Aristotle in his «Rhetoric» systematized types of discourse and figures, analyzing their function in forensic speech.
3rd-1st C. BCE
Hellenistic Period
The rhetorical schools of Pergamon and Rhodes further developed the classification of figures, studying their application in all genres of rhetoric, including forensic.
1st C. BCE - 2nd C. CE
Roman Period
Cicero and Quintilian integrated the Greek rhetorical tradition, analyzing figures and techniques of forensic discourse in their Latin works, such as «De Oratore» and «Institutio Oratoria».
1st C. CE
Dionysius of Halicarnassus
In his work «On Lysias», Dionysius explicitly refers to «σχῆμα δικανικόν» as characteristic of the orator Lysias's style, emphasizing the precision and effectiveness of his discourse.
4th-6th C. CE
Late Antiquity and Byzantium
Commentators and grammarians continued to study and teach rhetorical figures, preserving the tradition of ancient rhetoric and its terminology, including the forensic figure.

In Ancient Texts

Several characteristic passages highlight the importance of figures in rhetorical art, especially in forensic discourse.

«τὰ δὲ σχήματα τὰ δικανικὰ καὶ τὰ ἠθικὰ καὶ τὰ παθητικὰ καὶ τὰ ἄλλα πάντα, ὅσα τῆς ῥητορικῆς ἐστιν ὄργανα, οὐκ ὀλίγα τινὰ παρ' αὐτῷ [Λυσίᾳ] εὑρήσομεν.»
The forensic, ethical, and pathetic figures, and all others, whatever are instruments of rhetoric, we shall find not a few in him [Lysias].
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, De Lysia 16
«ἔστι δὲ τὸ σχῆμα τῆς λέξεως οὐκ ἐν τῷ εἰπεῖν τι, ἀλλ' ἐν τῷ πῶς εἰπεῖν.»
The figure of expression lies not in what one says, but in how one says it.
Aristotle, Rhetoric III 10, 1410b19-20

Lexarithmic Analysis

The lexarithmos of the word ΣΧΗΜΑ ΔΙΚΑΝΙΚΟΝ is 1084, from the sum of its letter values:

Σ = 200
Sigma
Χ = 600
Chi
Η = 8
Eta
Μ = 40
Mu
Α = 1
Alpha
= 0
Δ = 4
Delta
Ι = 10
Iota
Κ = 20
Kappa
Α = 1
Alpha
Ν = 50
Nu
Ι = 10
Iota
Κ = 20
Kappa
Ο = 70
Omicron
Ν = 50
Nu
= 1084
Total
200 + 600 + 8 + 40 + 1 + 0 + 4 + 10 + 20 + 1 + 50 + 10 + 20 + 70 + 50 = 1084

1084 decomposes into 1000 (hundreds) + 80 (tens) + 4 (units).

The 18 Methods

Applying the 18 traditional lexarithmic methods to the word ΣΧΗΜΑ ΔΙΚΑΝΙΚΟΝ:

MethodResultMeaning
Isopsephy1084Base lexarithmos
Decade Numerology41+0+8+4 = 13 → 1+3 = 4 — The Tetrad, representing stability, structure, and order, reflecting the organized nature of a rhetorical figure.
Letter Count1514 letters — The Tetradecad, signifying completeness and culmination, suggesting the full development and application of a rhetorical figure.
Cumulative4/80/1000Units 4 · Tens 80 · Hundreds 1000
Odd/EvenEvenFeminine force
Left/Right HandRightDivine (≥100)
QuotientComparative method
NotarikonΣ-Χ-Η-Μ-Α Δ-Ι-Κ-Α-Ν-Ι-Κ-Ο-ΝSophistication, Character, Harmony, Mastery, Artistry · Deliberation, Insight, Knowledge, Accuracy, Nuance, Integrity, Kinesis, Oratory, Necessity (interpretive)
Grammatical Groups6V · 3S · 6M6 vowels, 3 semivowels, 6 mutes — a balanced composition indicating the harmony and power of discourse.
PalindromesNo
OnomancyComparative
Sphere of DemocritusDivination with lunar day
Zodiacal IsopsephySaturn ♄ / Leo ♌1084 mod 7 = 6 · 1084 mod 12 = 4

Isopsephic Words (1084)

Words from the Liddell-Scott-Jones Lexicon with the same lexarithmos (1084) as «σχῆμα δικανικόν», but from different roots, offering interesting numerological connections:

κενοδοξέω
The verb «κενοδοξέω» means 'to be vain, boastful.' Its connection to «σχῆμα δικανικόν» might suggest the empty form or superficial display that an orator might adopt, lacking substantial content.
σπλάγχνον
«Σπλάγχνον» refers to the inward parts, the heart, the womb, and metaphorically to emotions. It contrasts with the external form (σχῆμα), highlighting the distinction between inner essence and outward appearance.
διοπτρισμός
«Διοπτρισμός» is the act of looking through something, observation. This can be linked to the need for careful examination of the 'form' of an argument, to reveal the truth beyond the surface.
ἐκπλήρωμα
«Ἐκπλήρωμα» means 'fulfillment, completion.' It relates to «σχῆμα δικανικόν» as the full and complete development of a rhetorical figure, achieving its purpose.
εὐεπίθετος
The adjective «εὐεπίθετος» means 'easy to attack, assailable.' It can refer to a rhetorical figure that, despite its external form, is weak and easily overturned by the opponent.
θεμιστοπόλος
«Θεμιστοπόλος» is one who administers justice, a judge. This isopsephy is particularly apt, as «σχῆμα δικανικόν» is a tool used precisely in the context of administering Themis (justice).

The LSJ lexicon contains a total of 63 words with lexarithmos 1084. For the full catalog and AI semantic filtering, see the interactive tool.

Sources & Bibliography

  • Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., Jones, H. S.A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th ed. with revised supplement. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
  • AristotleRhetoric. Translated by W. Rhys Roberts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924.
  • Dionysius of HalicarnassusOn Lysias. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.
  • PlatoRepublic. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.
  • QuintilianInstitutio Oratoria. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
  • Smyth, H. W.Greek Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956.
  • Kennedy, G. A.A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Explore this word in the interactive tool
Live AI filtering of isopsephic words + all methods active
OPEN THE TOOL →
← All words
Report an Error
Continue for free
To continue your research, complete the free registration.
FREE SIGN UP